Judge Rules Dad CAN STOP Mom From Transitioning 7 Year Old Son Into a Girl

0 1,565

A judge has ruled that BOTH parents will have joint conservatorship over their 7 year old son as it pertains to transitioning him to a girl named Luna. Both parents have to consent before the transition goes forward, essentially stopping the mother from continuing in the direction that she was headed. Jeff Younger has been battling his ex-wife Anne Georgulas in a Dallas family court over whether their son has gender dysphoria.

Georgulas has argued that the boy is transgender since he was four years old. Now at seven she wants the child to transition to a girl named Luna. Her ex-husband doesn’t believe James has gender dysphoria and that his child is just experiencing some confusion with gender, somewhat brought on by the mother.

He has accused Georgulas of forcing James to socially transition into a girl by making the child wear dresses.

Judge Kim Cooks ruled today that both the father and mother will remain in joint managing conservatorship and both have a say in his medical treatment.

Just moments before the judge’s decision was handed down, Younger told media outside court that he didn’t expect the proceedings to go in his favor.

‘I’m not anticipating a good result for my son,’ he said. ‘I think I’m not going to be able to stop the social transition of my son, which will probably lead to his medical transition.’

The Texan reports:

Judge Kim Cooks in the 255th Family District Court ruled today that seven-year-old James Younger and his twin brother would remain under a joint managing conservatorship under their parents, Jeff Younger and Anne Georgulas.

Cooks also gave the two parents joint decision making over all medical, dental, and psychiatric care for the twin boys, indicating that both the father and mother need to consent to the use of puberty blockers or other aspects of a “medical transition.”

Attorney fees are split.

Cooks also issued a gag order on the father.

A similar order was issued in another high-profile court case in Texas, which the Texas Solicitor General recently said is unconstitutional.

On Monday, a jury — which took several hours to deliberate and had one dissenting vote — told the judge that the current joint managing conservatorship of the children should become a sole managing conservatorship and that the father should not be the sole managing conservator.

Since the jury made their decision, the case has gained statewide and national traction.

State Rep. Matt Krause (R-Fort Worth) said on Twitter, “Absent a special session between now and the 87th Session, I will introduce legislation that prohibits the use of puberty blockers in these situations for children under eighteen. We missed our opportunity to do so in the 86th Session. We won’t miss the next one.”

My friend Zach stated it as well as anyone could, so I will let him have the last word:

There are countless little girls who were tomboys and then grew up to be wives and mothers, and countless little boys who were sissies who grew up to be husbands and fathers. In the past, psychologists recognized that kids go through phases and recommended not jumping to conclusions as such phases played out. What we’re seeing now is a PC experiment that’s going to come crashing down around thousands of children as they grow up. Ruined lives, all for some PC agenda.

Amen Zach and thank you judge! Now it is time for the Texas legislature to get to work and keep this insanity from happening again.

You might also like

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.