Did Trump say Ilhan Omar was married to her brother? Twice?

1 5,234

The media has been hounding President Trump into commenting on “The Squad” – four Freshman Democrat members of Congress, which include Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the now infamous Ilhan Omar (D-MN). Omar is being accused of entering into a bigamous, sham marriage to her brother in order to commit immigration and tax fraud. The charges, if proven true, could mean up to 40 years of prison time and/or deportation.

Watch the press goad President Trump into the controversy.

Trump Drops a STUNNER on Ilhan Omar & Immigration Fraud Claim

President Trump stuns reporters at the White House…"There's a lot of talk about the fact that she was married to her brother. I know nothing about it. I hear she was married to her brother."😲😲😲

Posted by White House Brief on Thursday, July 18, 2019

I thought for sure I heard him say; “I know nothing about it” and only repeating what he has heard about her marriage to her brother. Does the press think getting the President to comment on it will make it go away or cause him to look bad? So is it true or not?

Tucker Carlson reported on a new report from David Steinberg at Powerline Blog about the allegations surrounding Rep. Ilhan Omar’s marital history . He has been closely investigating Ilhan Omar’s background for years since she entered public life:

“In 1995 Ilhan entered the United States as a fraudulent member of the Omar family. That is not her family. The Omar family is a second unrelated family which was being granted asylum by the United States. The Omars allowed Ilhan, her genetic sister Sahra, and her genetic father Nur Said to use false names to apply for asylum as members of the Omar family. Ilhan’s genetic family split up at this time. Ilhan’s three other siblings, using their real names, managed to get asylum in the United Kingdom.”

The facts describe perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history. The information was given to Steinberg by multiple sources within the Minneapolis Somali community.

 

In 1995, Ilhan entered the United States as a fraudulent member of the “Omar” family.

That is not her family. The Omar family is a second, unrelated family which was being granted asylum by the United States. The Omars allowed Ilhan, her genetic sister Sahra, and her genetic father Nur Said to use false names to apply for asylum as members of the Omar family. Ilhan’s genetic family split up at this time. The above three received asylum in the United States, while Ilhan’s three other siblings — using their real names — managed to get asylum in the United Kingdom.

Ilhan Abdullahi Omar’s name, before applying for asylum, was Ilhan Nur Said Elmi.

The Minneapolis Star-Tribune has tried to investigate the matter, but Omar is not participating and refused even to provide the full names of her immediate family. Think about that: Omar will not even reveal the names of her family.

According to Steinberg there is credible evident that Ilhan Omar and her family changed their name to illegally enter the United States back in 1995 and believes Rep. Omar committed perjury at least eight times, beginning as early as 2009. If proven in a court of law, the charges against the Muslim Democrat Rep could mean up to 40 years of prison time and/or even forced deportation.

David Steinberg wraps up his article with the following list of possible crimes Ilhan Omar may have committed:

Consider the disturbingly inadequate evidence used to obtain FISA warrants on members of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. Consider that Democratic representatives have demanded that Attorney General William Barr release grand jury testimony — itself an illegal act.

Yet here we have:

  • Verifiable UK and U.S. marriage records
  • Verifiable address records
  • Time-stamped, traceable, archived online communications (Convictions and settlements based upon social media evidence are commonplace, Anthony Weiner being a notable example)
  • Background check confirmations of SSNs and birthdates
  • Archived court documents signed under penalty of perjury
  • Photos which can be examined to rule out digital manipulation
  • The 2019 Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board investigation, which found Omar filed illegal joint tax returns with a man who was not her husband in at least 2014 and 2015
  • Three years’ of evidence published across many articles — none of which has been shown to be incorrect, or have even been challenged with contradictory evidence from Rep. Omar or any other source
  • Perjury evidence that stands on its own — regardless of whom she married:
    • Long after June 2011, she was clearly in contact with the only man in either the U.S. or the UK with the same name and birthdate as the man she married. She was clearly in contact with several people who were in contact with him.
    • Further, Preya Samsundar did contact him, published how she managed to contact him, and published his email admitting to being photographed with Omar in London in 2015. To be clear: Omar was legally married to an “Ahmed Nur Said Elmi” at the time she was photographed next to a man who admits his name is Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, and that he is in the photo.
    • Samsundar published all of this information on how to contact Ahmed Nur Said Elmi a few months before Omar swore to that nine-question court document.
  • Rep. Omar has refused all inquiries from her constituents, elected officials, and media outlets to provide any specific evidence contradicting even a single allegation suggested by three years of now-public information.
  • In fact, Omar has responded by making information less available:
    • In August 2016, after Scott Johnson and Preya Samsundar posted the allegations, Omar’s verified social media accounts were taken offline.
    • Ahmed Nur Said Elmi’s social media accounts were also taken offline.
    • When the accounts returned, a large amount of potentially incriminating evidence had verifiably been deleted.
    • I found and published at least ten additional “before and after” instances of evidence still being deleted in 2018.
  • Omar has released carefully worded, Clintonian statements that denigrate those seeking answers from her as racists. Yet she has repeatedly refused to answer questions or issue anything other than public relations statements.
  • I have a large amount of information that we have not published for reasons including the protection of sources.

I believe Scott Johnson, Preya Samsundar, and me, with our three years of articles, columns and posts, have provided more than enough evidence to give law enforcement authorities probable cause to open an investigation. Now would be the chance for law enforcement, and especially for Rep. Ilhan Omar’s House colleagues, to make a sincere stand against corruption and for the uniform application of the law.

 

 

 

You might also like
1 Comment
  1. Marilynn Reeves says

    Sounds like she is as illegal as you can get. All involved need to be deported.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.