Democratic Congressman Slams Impeachment Hearings, States Process Reminds Him Of ‘Third-World Nations’

0 837

Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-NJ) is not your average Democrat these days. He’s what they call a Blue-Dog Democrat and is considered moderate. He’s one of two Dems who voted against impeaching President Trump. He stood by his vote against the House impeachment inquiry following the first round of public impeachment hearings last week but his decision to sway from his party is unrelated to President Trump, he explained.

“We have to understand, impeachment is something that’s supposed to be exceptionally unusual. It is supposed to be bipartisan. It is supposed to be fair,” Van Drew said on the latest episode of Fox Nation’s “Maria Bartiromo’s Insiders.” “This has nothing to do with whether you like Donald Trump, or don’t like him, or want to see him have a second term or win in an election. This has to do with the institution of impeachment itself and not misusing it,” he argued. Finally, some sanity from the Democrats.

From Fox News:

“Van Drew was one of the two House Democrats who broke ranks with party leadership in a highly contentious vote for a resolution setting the rules for the impeachment inquiry into President Trump, last month.

“The resolution passed 232-196, but lacked votes from Reps. Jeff Van Drew, D-N.J., who has long expressed skepticism about impeachment, and Collin Peterson, D-Minn, whose district Trump won by 31 points.

“At the end of the day we’ll have the same president and same candidate and a failed impeachment process, and the only difference would be that the president will have been exonerated of charges,” Van Drew said in a statement to Fox News at the time.

“Discussing his decision on the Fox Nation show over the weekend, Van Drew cited a piece on the topic written by French political thinker and historian Alexis De Tocqueville more than 150 years ago.

“You know, De Tocqueville in 1853 wrote that if a nation was more and more often using…impeachment as a way of actually removing its leaders, it would show the deterioration of the nation,” Van Drew said.

“It is so rarely used, should be rarely used. And as I’ve mentioned to you before, it is something that during the hundreds of years of American history has never been successfully used,” he added.

“Comparing the impeachment of a president to “more like something you would see in Europe or third-world nations,” Van Drew encouraged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to shift her focus to “real issues” for the remaining 14 working days in Congress before year’s end.

“What we could do…there are three or four major issues where the president, the speaker, the Senate all agree on…USMCA — we can really get that done. Other issues as well that they agree on… infrastructure. We could get that done,” Van Drew said.

“So wouldn’t it be wonderful at the end of this presidency, to the benefit of both political parties, but most of all, to the benefit of Americans, if we actually got some of these very important issues finished and taken care of instead? It will not happen in this toxic atmosphere,” he added.

“Host Maria Bartiromo agreed that the “impeachment inquiry seems to be taking all the oxygen out of the room,” and questioned whether it would require additional days in session beyond the 14 days left to the year.

“That’s part of the problem, and there’s going to be a big push to at least try to get a few bills through the House..and that’s good,” Van Drew said, “but to me, if we can create at least an atmosphere concerning these three or four issues where we can all work together, obviously, including the Senate and the president, that would be amazingly wonderful way to end what’s been a very, very difficult few years.”

“Other Democrats share Van Drew’s concern that the impeachment inquiry is distracting Congress from focusing on important issues affecting the country, he claimed, but it boils down to the final vote.

“I don’t know how they’re going to vote on impeachment, and that’s going to fascinate me as well, because some folks sort of change their mind a little bit during the… inquiry process. What I do know is there are many good moderate Democrats that truly want to get things done that do want to be bipartisan,” he said.

“I’m not there just to have a good time,” Van Drew added, “because frankly, it isn’t that much of a good time. So, you know, I’m there because we need to get things done. We have a job. We need to do it — whether we always like each other or not, whether we’re the same party or not, whether we agree on everything or not. That’s the deal, that’s what we need to do. And there are people who want to do that…and I hope that we finally do.”‘

The way Pelosi and Schiff have conducted these impeachment hearings is way more representative of a communist country or a dictatorial regime than a constitutional Republic. He’s right… it feels like third-world politics.

It gets even worse as a number of Democrats are privately expressing “concern” about the impeachment inquiry against President Trump.

Here’s a partial transcript of that interview:

MARIA BARTIROMO: We’re expecting an impeachment vote sometime in December. How will you vote?

REP. JEFF VAN DREW: I would imagine I’ll be voting “no.” Now, I always have a codicil if there’s something new, something we haven’t heard, something that really rises to the level of treason or a high crime, that would be different. But we don’t see that. We see little different variations, hearsay, discussions that somebody heard something that somebody else said. Impeachment, as you know, our founding fathers had vigorous debates over whether they would even allow impeachment in the Constitution. You don’t disenfranchise voters, millions upon millions of voters. Voters choose their leaders in America.

BARTIROMO: Are you hearing from some of your colleagues in some of the states that President Trump won that they may also vote “no?” Are you hearing some concerns amongst your colleagues or are you sort of a lone wolf in all of this?

REP. VAN DREW: I don’t know how other folks will vote, because in all honesty, originally, I thought there were going to be a few more, not that it matters to me if I’m one or I’m 101. I do what I believe is right. There is some discussion among some of them quietly, privately, of concern, certainly. What I’m hearing out in the street is with most people is, they’re kind of tired, they’re kind of worn out, they’re kind of bored, most folks, and they really want to move on. Unless there’s something new and amazing, we know the end game here.

Van Drew also went on to point out that people should “understand the importance” of impeachment and added that no president has been impeached and convicted in the Senate. “We’re going to have an election next year, let’s have the election, let’s fight through the election, let’s do what Republicans and Democrats and whomever else does, but this is going to get us nowhere. We’ve spent millions of dollars, in my opinion, tons of money, tons of time, tons of hurt, fracturing the nation apart. I haven’t seen this to be a good thing,” Van Drew concluded.

I like this guy – he’s honest and he’s telling it like it is. It’s wrong and subversive to try and remove a duly elected president simply because you don’t like him. To lie and make up evidence to get him removed is also treasonous. This whole impeachment nonsense is also a huge waste of time and money. It makes a mockery of our politics and should never have happened in the first place.

The Dems know that they’re not going to succeed in getting Trump ousted, they’re hoping they create just enough movement in votes to help them win in 2020, never mind ripping the country in half and fracturing our political process. It’s never going to happen — in fact, they are ensuring a Trump second term.

Sources: Fox News, Breitbart, RedState, The Daily Wire, The Epoch Times

You might also like

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.