Trey Gowdy Returns to TV, Rips Adam Schiff a New *hole & Exposes His Phony Russia Collusion Nonsense
In spite of a two-year investigation that hasn’t uncovered a scintilla of evidence of ‘collusion’ between Russia and the Donald Trump campaign or Administration, Democratic Representative Adam Schiff of California continues to push the narrative, saying there’s is “evidence in plain sight.”
There is nothing quite as refreshing as a b*itch slap from “Bulldog Gowdy” and when Trey Gowdy, former South Carolina representative and federal prosecutor, decided to give the California politician a slamming and a little English lesson, we knew you would want to see it.
On Fox’s “The Story with Martha MacCallum,” she played Gowdy a clip of “Little Adam” Schiff repeating the claim that there’s clear evidence that President Donald Trump colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 election.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said Monday on CNN. “Now, there is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.” Watch, then scroll down for the smackdown:
— The Hill (@thehill) February 18, 2019
Seriously, what a smug hack this guy is. Fortunately, Gowdy set the record straight for a very confused Little Adam Schiff. Schiff doesn’t have proof to back up his “collusion” theory, so Gowdy also gave him a lesson on the word “collusion.”
“I’ve heard Adam on a number of occasions say that he is the third eye raven, has evidence and seen things that nobody else has ever seen before, but I’ve never heard him asked, ‘What is it? What’s the evidence of crime that you have, Chairman Schiff?’ I’ve never heard it followed up on.”
Schiff was unable to understand the contradiction he made in his comments, so Gowdy cleared it up for him and explained exactly what the word “collusion” entails.
Gowdy explained, “Well, collusion is a synonym for conspiracy. So, I hope the questioner followed up and said, ‘OK, Chairman Schiff, you have just said that you have evidence of a criminal conspiracy between the president of the United States and the Russian state. What is that evidence? What is the crime?’”
Schiff’s own statement about the alleged collusion is self-defeating — he admitted he can’t prove collusion happened “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
And without having evidence “beyond a reasonable doubt,” it’s impossible to convict someone. CNN won’t hold Schiff accountable for his nonsensical claims, but thankfully Trey Gowdy did.