The Epoch Times is now reporting former top FBI attorney under Barack Obama testified that; “Hillary Clinton should have been charged for her “alarming, appalling” mishandling of classified information..”
The bombshell exclusive exposes Baker’s testimony to Congress, where he swore under oath he battled with other members of the FBI, including the now fired director, James Comey about the Clinton investigation: continued below:
Former FBI General Counsel James Baker PHOTO CREDIT: Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times
From the Epoch Times
“My original belief … after having conducted the investigation and towards the end of it, then sitting down and reading a binder of her materials, I thought that it was alarming, appalling, whatever words I said, and argued with others about why they thought she shouldn’t be charged,” Baker told Congress.
Confronted with a damning summary of abnormalities, bias, and omissions, which transpired during the investigation, Baker told Congress that the investigation indeed was “highly unusual.”
“I had a jaundiced eye about everything, yes. I had skepticism about all this stuff. I was concerned about all of this. This whole situation was horrible, and it was novel and we were trying to figure out what to do, and it was highly unusual,” Baker told lawmakers.
Pulling directly from the aquired transcripts, the Times reports that there were multiple abnormalities in the probe into Trump collusion with Russia and the basis for which the entire Mueller investigation was predicated on:
Former top FBI attorney James Baker admitted to House lawmakers in October last year that the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump 2016 presidential campaign and Russia was riddled with abnormalities.
The transcripts of the interviews haven’t been publicly released, but were obtained by the Epoch Times.
James Baker served as general counsel when the FBI investigated the Trump campaign, and also Hillary’s use of the now infamous unauthorized private email server. During 2 days of testimony, he told members of Congress that he believed even toward the end of the Clinton investigation that she should have been charged over her “alarming, appalling” mishandling of classified information.
He argued with then-FBI Director James Comey, about the issue all the way toward the end of the investigation, but was ultimately over-ruled and Hillary Clinton was let go scot-free, even though she hadn’t been interviewed. This is shocking to say the least and exposes Comey for the Trump-hater he clearly is.
More testimony from Baker: “My original belief … after having conducted the investigation and towards the end of it, then sitting down and reading a binder of her materials, I thought that it was alarming, appalling, whatever words I said, and argued with others about why they thought she shouldn’t be charged.”
Baker also testified that it was Michael Sussmann, a partner at Perkins Coie, who shared with him information that detailed alleged communications between servers in Trump Tower and servers located in Russia at Alfa Bank—an allegation that eventually was completely debunked, but widely reported as fact by the mainstream media and pushed even now by CNN, NBC, MSNBC, just to name a few:
To be updated and continued: