Trump Officially Removes Obama’s Gun Ban from Social Security Administration Federal Code!

0 250

The Social Security Administration (SSA) has announced that it has officially removed the Social Security gun ban from the federal code.

The insane ban allowed the SSA to strip recipients of their Second Amendment Rights without any due process by allowing the SSA to investigate those who required help managing finances. These recipients were subject to a broad mental health analysis that included treatable and temporary issues “like anxiety and depression to major issues like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.”


On May 18 the SSA’s announced:

We are removing from the Code of Federal Regulations the final rules, Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (NIAA), published on December 19, 2016. We are doing so because Congress passed, and the President signed, a joint resolution of disapproval of the final rules under the Congressional Review Act.

Duke University psychiatry and behavioral science professor Jeffrey Swanson observed that Barack Obama’s Social Security gun ban targeted the “vulnerable” rather than the dangerous.

The Washington Post quoted Swanson’s explanation that the ban “[takes] away the gun rights of a large category of individuals without any evidence that they pose a risk of harm to self or others.”

The insanity was a piece of the left’s hard work to destroy the 2nd Amendment. While legally, Obama made some gains, nationwide, it backfired.

Gun ownership tripled, gun production doubled, and many states passed open carry, Constitutional carry and even laws forbidding state law enforcement from cooperating with the feds on any type of gun confiscation.

State after state moved to shore up state protections against the federal government 2nd Amendment infringement.

Taking away the rights of Social Security recipients does absolutely nothing to lower gun crime. But time after time, armed law abiding citizens have proven to do so!

Trump Officially Removes Obama's Gun Ban from Social Security Administration Federal Code!

Recently, a student at University of Texas at Austin stopped what could have been a very grave situation when he pulled out his concealed weapon and stopped a man stabbing students with a knife.

Multiple people sustained potentially serious injuries, and one person died after the stabbing attack that seemed to target fraternity members at the Texas school.

Eyewitnesses reported that a student pulled out a concealed handgun on the suspect and made him back down, stopping what was heading towards a slaughter!

It really is simple. Two buildings and two signs. One says, “No Guns Allowed” and the other says, “We’re packin’”.

Which building will a thug decide to enter for nefarious purposes?

When will the left learn? The Founding Fathers understood some basic concepts that have withstood the test of time throughout history. Man has the incoherent right to protect himself and his family. Criminals do not obey laws. You cannot sanitize the world of its problems.

I will repeat. Two buildings and two signs. One says, “No Guns Allowed” and the other says, “We’re packin’”.

Which building will a thug decide to enter for nefarious purposes?

If it worked, why don’t we just put: “No Robberies Allowed” signs on the front door of all our banks?

When a thug walks into a building and sees that they are not the only ones armed, they will walk right back out the door.

The biggest word in the 2nd Amendment is the word, “Infringed” – act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.

The fringe of the carpet is the very edges. Our right to bear arms is not supposed to be messed with in any way. It will always work better that way!

Thank goodness this Texas citizen was able to stop an incident that could have been much worse than it was.

You might also like