Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

BETRAYED! Democrats Finally Blaming Hillary for November Election Loss! OUCH!


Top Democratic Party strategists have used new data to come to a startling conclusion about why Hillary Clinton lost: Hillary Rodham Clinton!

Hillary and the Democrats have been blaming everyone and everything for the disastrous loss for months now.

It is amazing that some of the big wigs are throwing Hillary under the bus. Maybe they panicked at the rumors about Hillary making another go at it in 2020.

Hillary was solely responsible for her loss. She went up against a competitor who had the worst approval as a Republican candidate in history.

Top Democratic Party strategists have used new data to come to a startling conclusion about why Hillary Clinton lost: Hillary Rodham Clinton! Betrayal!

She was sick, detached, and unable to convey her message. Hillary was awful as a candidate. It is 100% her fault. Period.

MSM.Com explains:

But new information shows that Clinton had a much bigger problem with voters who had supported President Barack Obama in 2012 but backed Trump four years later.

Those Obama-Trump voters effectively accounted for more than two-thirds of the reason Clinton lost, according to Matt Canter, a senior vice president of the Democratic political firm Global Strategy Group. In his group’s analysis, about 70 percent of Clinton’s failure to reach Obama’s vote total in 2012 was because she lost these voters.

Canter and other members of Global Strategy Group have delivered a detailed report of their findings to senators, congressmen, fellow operatives and think tank wonks — all part of an effort to educate party leaders about what the data say really happened in last year’s election.

“We have to make sure we learn the right lesson from 2016, that we don’t just draw the lesson that makes us feel good at night, make us sleep well at night,” Canter said.

His firm’s conclusion is shared broadly by other Democrats who have examined the data, including senior members of Clinton’s campaign and officials at the Democratic data and analytics firm Catalist. (The New York Times, in its own analysis, reached a similar conclusion.)

The findings are significant for the Democratic Party. Liberals are at an historic low point.

For 8 years, they attacked conservatives and Republicans with every Saul Alinsky tactic available. They attacked Christians and made excuses for Muslim extremists.

They lost the Senate, House, Governorships, and a boatload of local offices.

Had it not been for the liberal epicenters of California and New York, even the popular vote would have been a slaughter.

Hillary was going to be Obama – Part 2 and America said ‘No’!

They just HAD to have the first woman president and it just HAD to be Hillary. They did not care about her age, health, ability, or baggage. It was just assumed that she would win. Hillary was “entitled”

Because Hillary believed she had been already coronated, she made many false assumptions. She assumed that she would just sail into the WH without a fight. Hillary assumed that every Obama voter would just automatically select her name on the ballot. She assumed Americans did not think her lying about Benghazi made a difference.

In fact, until a couple of days before the election, she was already picking out kitchen curtains for the White House. Boy, would I have liked to have been a fly on the wall when she learned her true fate!


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

About Author

Scott Osborn is a Writer, Preacher, Political activist, as well as the Social Media Director for the TV Comedy Show, The Flipside with Michael Loftus. Scott hosts several radio shows, including the wildly popular “Conover U” starring Rodney Lee & the Preacher..

Send this to a friend