Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Informant Reveals Who REALLY Leaked Emails to Julian Assange: HAS PROOF IT WASN’T RUSSIA!


A former British Ambassador for Uzbekistan and Wikileaks operative has come forward to quash those bogus claims about who hacked into the DNC server and leaked the emails. Now we know where the leak came from, and it wasn’t Russia. 

The latest fake news coming from the left is the idea that Russia leaked sensitive information to Julian Assange and Wikileaks in an effort to interfere with the U.S. presidential election, which ultimately resulted in President-elect Donald Trump’s victory. (News flash, Democrats – Trump won because America DID NOT want four more years of the same failed liberal policies!)


Craig Murray, who has direct access to the source of the leak, revealed via his blog:

“As [WikiLeaks founder] Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access? Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it is not Russia are those who do have access.”

The former British ambassador to Uzbekistan pointed to a Democratic Party insider and called the reports of Russian tomfoolery by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence ‘hilarious’ and ‘devoid of evidence.’

“When I saw the report the other night I genuinely believed that was The Daily Mash or some other humorous site that had done a spoof. It seems such a mockery of what we’ve had, which is weeks and weeks of assertion without evidence. And it was so totally devoid of evidence, that I thought it must be a joke,” he told RT.

He added that the report failed to cite any factual evidence “because the assertions it is making are factually untrue.”

Murray believes that the report is full of “illogical assertions built on nothing.”

Murray told MailOnline that he flew to Washington, D.C., to personally collect the thousands of leaked Clinton campaign emails from an intermediary for “disgusted” Democratic whistleblowers. He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University on northwest D.C.

“Neither of [the leaks]came from the Russians. The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks,” said Murray. “I don’t understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn’t true. Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.”

“LIKE” my Facebook Page – no one turned away!

He added that the leakers were motivated by “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.” Those who pay attention also know it wasn’t just the DNC who was carrying water for Hillary Clinton:

The US intelligence report on alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election is uncritically supported by the same media which was biased in favor of Hillary Clinton during the campaign, WikiLeaks associate Craig Murray told RT.

criticized Western mainstream media for accepting the report uncritically instead of independently confirming the statements contained in it, like proper journalists are supposed to do. He said this trend was “extremely worrying.”

“They could only put out such a bad report with no evidence to back it up if they were already certain that the mainstream media would report it, support it, and not investigate it,” Murray remarked.

“The trouble is the Western mainstream media have very few journalists anymore. They are just stenographers who type out the neocon narrative and don’t question the official line. Nobody of any intelligence could have read this report and believed it. Almost certainly the MSM journalists, who are supporting the report, have only read some of it at the start and have not actually read through the thing.

“One of the points in the report is that it criticizes RT for saying that the mainstream media were biased in favor of Hillary Clinton during the US presidential election. That’s simply true. It’s like saying ‘the sky is blue.’ There was no doubt whatsoever where the bias laid. And now we see that the same mainstream media’s… coming out to support this report and destabilize the incoming president,” Murray concluded.

SHARE this report to EXPOSE the fact that the Obama Administration is lying about Russia being involved in the hack of the Clinton campaign’s emails!


One would hope that Trump would undergo some thorough cleansing of that snake nest, starting with Congress and ending with MSM. They belong on the streets begging for a dime for the rest of their lives. The good news is that people are waking up as to the unreliable, biased, hypocritical and dangerous attitude of the MSM. We can clearly see breaches in a system that has been held in place over the years with lies and deception to accomplish goals that cost many innocent people their lives.

Those breaches are going to get bigger and will hopefully lead to the collapse of a system that doesn’t serve the people, but only itself. A man can dream, right?



Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

About Author

Baron Von Kowenhoven

Baron was just a shy kid with a dream, growing up in the 40's with a knack for story-telling. After a brief career in film, Von Kowenhoven went to Europe in search of fringe-scientific discoveries and returned in the 90's to unleash them on the entertainment and political landscape of America.

Send this to a friend