WHEN is enough really enough, especially when it comes to the co-opting of the kiddies? Do parents, grandparents and concerned citizens have any red lines left, so to speak? Or, is it just easier to just let the following terminal-like infection to run its course, hoping that loved ones escape unscathed?
IF so, good luck to said fairy tale thinking.
Commentary By Adina Kutnicki
MOST are familiar with the overt methods used by totalitarian regimes to gain control. In fact, one can hardly miss the signals, as dissidents are scooped up and never heard from again. On the other hand, ever since the 1960’s, powerful radicals within America have been much more circumspect. This is where the kiddies come in.
Despite their advancing age, they are as dangerous as ever — perhaps more so. Bill Ayers, the foremost leader of the Weathermen (a domestic terror group) “is in his third decade as a national leader in the movement to radicalize the educational training of schoolteachers”. His wife, Bernardine Dohrn, a top leader too “is a professor of law at Northwestern and a high-ranking officer in the American Bar Association.” Eleanor Raskin (ne Stein) “is a law professor at S.U.N.Y Albany and, astonishingly, a NYS administrative law judge”. Jeff Jones “currently heads the New York-based Apollo Alliance, a highly influential coalition of labor leaders and environmentalists, and was responsible for drafting President Obama’s 2009 Recovery Act.”
The list of “respectable” cover, of other “notables” in the Weathermen, is equally impressive. Through a stringently planned operational “stealth jihad”, yesteryear’s Weathermen have returned, fully primed to carry out their original goal — the “transformation” of Amerika. Most significantly, they subvert the national interest from a distinctly dangerous vantage point. They are currently ensconced in some of the most powerful positions in academia and political life. The only difference is, this time they are dressed in “capitalist” garb, not only in their clothing choices, but in the wealth they have accumulated, paradoxically, through joining the “establishment”. Who said one can’t enrich oneself, but at the same time deny the masses/proletariat said wealth potential? Highly dangerous in their bomb-making days, their capacity to cripple America, sans firing actual weaponry is that much greater at this critical juncture in time.Deeply involved in the “transformation” process, as promised by President Obama, many of them working inside the executive branch, while others operate through progressive think tanks, they want nothing more than to distance themselves from their bloody past. Therefore, a omerta has descended from the denizens of the leftist media and their powerful organs….continue here…
INDUBITABLY, with many helping hands, Ayers controls the educational apparatus for teachers’ training. Okey dokey. But to what end? Well, as inferred, the overall purpose is to capture their hearts and minds, and for generations to come. As is said, children are the future. Effectively, separating them from parental control is mandatory, and this can only be accomplished via the opening paragraph’s reference to a ‘circumspect’ approach. Stealth-like.
LO and behold, how many times do parents have to hear about leading gay activists – you know, those who work hand-in-glove with educators who actually ‘teach’ the kids about their ‘choices’ – being arrested for the crime of pedophilia aka pederasty, many of whom are associated with the Gay-in-Chief too?? Go figure.
(Snug as two bugs-in-a-rug….introducing, serial sodomizer, Terry Bean, a major Demster fundraiser and gay activist…hmm)
Ahead of a trial in which a jury will decide whether the 66-year-old Bean is guilty of engaging in sex acts with a teenager, Clackamas County, Oregon, prosecutor Scott Healy filed court documents alleging the Portland man had abused another teenager in 1979, the Register-Guard newspaper in Eugene reported
Only days ago, the paper said, Bean’s attorneys had reached an agreement with the first accuser, a 15-year-old boy alleging abuse in 2013, that could result in dismissal of the case.
But Healy objects to Bean’s proposed civil settlement, the details of which have not been made public, and contends the alleged abuse in 1979 should be admissible at the trial, scheduled to begin Aug. 11.
Bean’s attorney, Derek Ashton of Portland, said in a statement, “We look forward to the hearing next week and an end to this defamation.”
The second allegation comes from a doctor in California who told police in January he was 16 when he began a sexual relationship with Bean in 1979 when Bean lived in Eugene.
Healy did not return a request by WND for comment.
‘One after another’
The Eugene paper noted Bean was first recognized for his activism in the 1970s when he helped persuade the Eugene City Council to pass an ordinance barring discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Scott Lively, known for his opposition to the “gay”-rights agenda, was communications director for an activist group that proposed ballot measures in the early 1990s to defend against the homosexual movement.
He told WND in an interview the Bean case fits a pattern.
“This is very common,” he said. “We see gay-activist leaders, one after another, being accused, sometimes charged, with pederasty – adult male homosexuality with teenage boys.”
Among them are San Francisco LGBT icon Larry Brinkin, Duke University professor Frank Lombard and Walter Lee Williams, professor of gender studies at the University of Southern California.
Lively, head of the non-profit Abiding Truth Ministries in Springfield, Massachusetts, noted Bean’s Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s leading homosexual-rights group, named him LGBT Global Public Enemy No. 1, in part for saying that many homosexual men are pederasts.
Oregon voters, Lively said, could have “stopped the LGBT agenda dead in its tracks” in 1992 by supporting the ballot measures he promoted.
He pointed out that prosecutors allege regarding the 2013 charge that Bean paid the victim $40 after the encounter and encouraged the boy to join a support group for “gay” youths.
“I have alleged for many years that these LGBT youth groups are really not much more than grooming center for predators, and this supports that allegation,” Lively told WND.
In the early 1990s, he said, when he worked with the Oregon Citizens Alliance, there was a lot of talk about centers in which young people from ages 12-24 were mixing, along with adult chaperons.
“These are people who identify themselves by their interest in same-sex attraction, and their lives are defined by sexuality,” Lively said. “So it’s a little different than a normal group with adult chaperons that don’t have that particular proclivity.”
The Willamette Week newspaper reported last year that Bean had raised more money to support President Obama than any other Oregonian.
According to the charging document, Bean and his then-boyfriend, Kiah Lawson of Junction City, met the 15-year-old victim on Sept. 27, 2013, through a popular smart phone application for homosexuals called Grindr.
The Willamette Week reported allegations Lawson had attempted to extort money from Bean after finding Bean videoed sexual encounters with other men with a hidden camera.
Bean’s lawyer Ashton claimed in a statement that “for almost two years, Terry Bean has been the victim of Kiah Lawson’s schemes and lies, which have led law enforcement to harass Mr. Bean’s friends, seek out old acquaintances and threaten him with further prosecution unless he admits to events that did not occur.”
ENTER: IUD’s for sixth grade girls…sex-ed programs devised under the wings of associates of this same deviant crew!
The IUD is known as a long acting reversible contraception, and may even act as an abortifacient. So, a young teen in Seattle can’t get a coke at her high school, but she can have a device implanted into her uterus, which can unknowingly kill her unborn child immediately after conception. Or, if she uses another method, she can increase her chances of health risks for herself, especially if using a new method.
The high school, Chief Sealth International, a public school, began offering the devices in 2010, made possible by a Medicaid program known as Take Charge and a non-profit, Neighborcare. Students can receive the device or other method free of cost andwithout their parent’s insurance. And while it’s lauded that the contraception is confidential, how can it be beneficial for a parent-child relationship when the parents don’t even know the devices or medication their daughter is using?
As it turns out, Chief Sealth isn’t the only school in Seattle doing this. As CNS News reports, more schools are fitting young girls — as young as 6th grade — with the devices and doing so without their parents knowing.
Middle and high school students can’t get a Coca-Cola or a candy bar at 13 Seattle public schools, but they can get a taxpayer-funded intrauterine device (IUD) implanted without their parents’ consent.
MIND you, no one should be foolish enough to believe that said penetrations are merely ‘coincidences’, and that they are not connected to the ultimate goal: the deconstruction of the family unit to capture generations of kiddies.
MOST significantly, the timing of gay ‘marriage’; the ‘legalization’ of pedophilia and bestiality; and the encouragement of sexual promiscuity ala birth control devices for heterosexual encounters (even for 12-year-old children) and a push towards homosexual experimentation, they are all designed to be as ‘natural’ as breathing. Indeed, they are varying sides to the same deconstruction end point; taught and sanctioned by school districts with inordinate control over millions of school children. How dare they.
IF anything, when kindergartners were first introduced to graphic sex acts and gay lifestyles within the classroom, alarm bells should have rung for millions of parents. The slippery slope.
(Of course, we are told that introducing this curriculum will reduce bullying of LGBT kids in schools, but the best way to reduce bullying is to teach that bullying is bad rather than gay is good. And does anyone really think that, say, showing kids images of a fat Buddha will stop the bullying of fat kids? More to the point, who gave the public schools the right to sexualize our children?)
Sex education – including same-sex relationships – is on the curriculum for Chicago public school students this year, and a leading Illinois conservative group thinks it’s only the beginning of practice that could become a new national norm.
And even though it’s radically different from the current sex ed programs, that begin in fifth or sixth grades, it’s a norm President Obama has backed since his days in the Illinois legislature.
According to CNS News, the new Chicago curriculum has been booted around in Springfield since at least 2003,when Obama was a state senator working with Planned Parenthood to push a sex education bill that not only pushed moved instruction from sixth-grade to kindergarten, it removed any mention of traditional marriage from the curriculum.
The bill didn’t pass until Obama left the legislature, though, for bigger things – like getting a brief Democrat supermajority in Congress to impose a takeover of the American health-care system. (If they can do that with the health system, you think they won’t try it with sex ed?)
The new sex ed policy was adopted by the Chicago Board of Education in February to begin this school year.
In a spring interview with the John Birch Society’s New American magazine, Illinois Family Institute cultural analyst Laurie Higgins said the curriculum is aimed at advancing acceptance of gay households.
“Comprehensive sex-ed dogmatists believe it’s appropriate for kindergartners to learn about families that are headed by homosexuals, whereas many parents believe that no child in early elementary school should hear anything about homosexuality,” Higgins said. “What’s worse, comprehensive sex ed proponents will present these disordered family structures positively.”
Higgins said the Chicago schools curriculum is part a National Sexuality Education Standards curriculum liberals are pushing around the country, developed by groups including the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network, the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, the abortion giant Planned Parenthood, and the National Education Association.
Supporters, like Stephanie Whyte, chief health officer of Chicago Public Schools, say the curriculum is just a way of exposing children to different family structures. “Whether that means there’s two moms at home, everyone’s home life is different, and we introduce the fact that we all have a diverse background,” Whyte said.
Higgins doesn’t think that’s a decision for parents — not a public school system — to make.
“It is not the obligation of public schools to teach about every sexuality-related phenomenon that exists,” Higgins told the New American. “And it is neither the obligation nor the right of public schools to affirm phenomena, like homosexual relationships, that many believe are immoral.”
BESIDES, since when is it the job of teachers to co-opt sensitive subject matters under the absolute purview of parental domains? So other than offering appropriate – emphasis placed – intro courses to sex ed for middle school and high school students, sexual discussions, not unlike religious issues, should be hands off. Period. That is, unless something else is at play. Hmm.
BOTTOM LINE: if the above is not resonant with American parents, so be it. As to those who are duly alarmed, as they should be, it is no longer tenable for parents to abdicate their authority to school districts. Who died and appointed them custodians over the children, other than for teaching the 3 R’s and other such academic disciplines?
INTRINSICALLY, the last thing America’s (mis)educational curriculum is geared towards fostering (even against the wishes of individual teachers) is good will between parent and child, thus, demonstrating respect for the traditional family. That bridge has been purposefully burned.
URGENTLY, it behooves each parent to obtain (yes, schools must allow access, otherwise, band together and sue the district’s board) the overall lesson plans for the year, in tandem with reading lists and non-academic presentations.
THE choice is yours and very stark: either parents execute their own due diligence, or they accept the consequences of their inaction. You can’t abdicate control and expect to have your cake and eat it too.