Maybe we could try to look through the fog of the political rhetoric clearer if we define each and every word they use, even if it takes a little time to do so.
The result could be that we would be better informed and they would not be able to “blind” us the way they do now.
First of all, lets define what is a:
He is an individual that believes in an economic system characterized by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. “Social ownership” may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these.
A Marxist theory holds that the development of the socialist mode of production will give rise to a COMMUNIST SOCIETY, in which classes and the state are no longer present, there is access abundance to final goods, and thus distribution is based on to each according to his need. (In a hope or in a dream, of course)
Is a former socialist who became Marxist after a lot of brain washing with utopic concepts that never materialize. He would be the useful idiot that will believe all the lies and deceptions of the Socialists/Marxists elites and found him/herself as an accomplice of all the national destruction that these predators will perform in the name of the “equality” (in poverty).
Someone favoring or advocating progress, change, improvement, or reform, as opposed to wishing to maintain things as they are, especially in political matters.
Socialist/Marxists have taken ownership of this concept to hide their real goals and desires.
It is just their best deception tool.
It combines social liberalism (an oxymoron) with support for social justice (a code phrase for Marxism) and a mixed economy.
American liberal causes include voting rights for African Americans ( voting more than once, as in recent past elections), abortion rights for women (killing the unborn), marriage equality (contra-natura marriages) and government programs such as education and health care (Obamacare?).
It has its roots in Theodore Roosevelt’s New Nationalism, Woodrow Wilson’s New Freedom, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, Harry S. Truman’s Fair Deal, John F. Kennedy’s New Frontier, and Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society.
Conservatives oppose liberals on most issues; the relationship between liberal and progressive is debated.
Keynesian economic theory has played a central role in the economic philosophy of modern American liberals. The argument has been that national prosperity requires government management of the macro economy (Govt. takeover) to keep unemployment low, inflation in check, and growth high, which has been proven an utopia during the present administration.
John F. Kennedy defined a liberal as follows:
…someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people — their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties — someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a ‘Liberal’, then I’m proud to say I’m a ‘Liberal’.
Could it be this, the reason for his assassination? Could it be that he meant what he said and was not “covered up” as his comrades?
A Socialist is a Socialist be it a Marxist Socialist or a National Socialist (Nazi).
They all have their own “Fuhrer” and their tactics are the same: CONTROL and POWER.
We are in dangerous times. The more we understand their “double talk” the more we will be able to defend ourselves our families and our homeland.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!