I just read the posted article, related to how 4th graders are indoctrinated that “the President was rejected by whites because he is black”.
We all know, that, is not true. Like it is not true most of the things they say in any field.
They just follow the “book” or should I say the many “books” the Marxists have as their “bibles”.
The distortion of reality and history as we know it to be true does not fit their need for indoctrination.
This is why you should not be surprise to find out that schools are their hunting ground for future “useful idiots” that will serve them well.
The post Cuban revolution shows exactly the same pattern. The text books were changed to reflect their propaganda. The regular school patterns were changed to dislocate and create persons with twisted ideology of their own background. The notions of respect, self esteem, pride, honor and honesty were “deleted” from the Cuban way of life just as they are being prepared to be “deleted” here in the US.
I was 13 years old when Castro was given powers in Cuba by the World Wide Marxist conspiracy. I saw the destruction of a society from within.
Castro did not win the revolution as it is commonly say to be the fact. No, he was handed the power when Fulgencio Batista was forced to leave Cuba to make way to Communism.
Cubans were and some still are, politically ignorant and fell for the lies and empty promises that the new
Dictator gave them. It was all the same, again, but this time much worst.
I see this dangerously happening in US. The low information crowd is falling for the deception of the Marxists Revolutionaries in power.
We are in other times and in another place but the tactics and methods are the same. Just follow the
“book” on Marxism and/or Saul Alinsky’s Tactics for Revolutionaries and you will know exactly what to expect
Saul Alinsky dedication of his book says it all:
“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”
Just see what Saul Alinsky has in the prologue of his book:
“The Revolutionary force today has two targets, moral as well as material. Its young protagonists are one moment reminiscent of the idealistic early Christians, yet they also urge violence and cry, ‘Burn the system down!’ They have no illusions about the system, but plenty of illusions about the way to change our world. It is to this point that I have written this book.”
The purpose of his methods:
In this book we are concerned with how to create mass organizations to seize power and give it to the people; to realize the democratic dream of equality, justice, peace…. “Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.’ This means revolution.” p.3
“Radicals must be resilient, adaptable to shifting political circumstances, and sensitive enough to the process of action and reaction to avoid being trapped by their own tactics and forced to travel a road not of their choosing.” p.6
“A Marxist begins with his prime truth that all evils are caused by the exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists. From this he logically proceeds to the revolution to end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization into a new social order of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and finally the last stage — the political paradise of communism.” p.10
“An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth — truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing…. To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations….” pp.10-11
This is what Alinsky says about “Means and Ends” [Forget moral or ethical considerations]
“The end is what you want, the means is how you get it. Whenever we think about social change, the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. … The real arena is corrupt and bloody.” p.24
“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…. The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means… The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be….” pp.25-26
“The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means….” p.29
“The seventh rule… is that generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics….” p.34
“The tenth rule… is you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments…. It involves sifting the multiple factors which combine in creating the circumstances at any given time… Who, and how many will support the action?… If weapons are needed, then are appropriate d weapons available? Availability of means determines whether you will be underground or above ground; whether you will move quickly or slowly…” p.36
And then read what Saul Alinsky’s son writes about our President:
“Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday.” –Letter from L. DAVID ALINSKY, son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky
Do you think it is mere coincidence?
Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky: “True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties…. Many leftists view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky’s counsel to do and say whatever it takes to gain power.
“Obama is also an Alinskyite…. Obama spent years teaching workshops on the Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the Developing Communities Project…. Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. While trying to build coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer.” (By Richard Poe, 11-27-07
I don’t have to say more. The rest is happening as we speak. You have the last say. Please be alert and….VOTE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA.