Former U.N. Ambassador, John Bolton stated on Fox News that he would not be surprised if the Obama administration “politicized” reports of the Russian interference in the presidential election and that it may be a “false flag”.
It certainly wouldn’t be the first time Obama has “politicized” intelligence reports to make something APPEAR different from the real truth to HIS advantage. What about the Benghazi reports? Or how about Obama’s narrative on “winning the war on ISIS”? Weren’t reports on both of these politicized by Obama?
Here’s John Bolton on Fox News:
H/T The Hill:
“It is not at all clear to me, just viewing this from the outside, that this hacking into the [Democratic National Committee] and the [Republican National Committee] was not a false flag operation,” he told Fox News’s Eric Shawn on Sunday.
When pressed about his use of the phrase “false flag” and whether he was accusing an entity in the U.S. of involvement, Bolton said, “We just don’t know.”
“But I believe that intelligence has been politicized in the Obama administration to a very significant degree.”
But, “if you think the Russians did this, then why did they leave fingerprints” that led the CIA to its conclusion, Bolton questioned.
“We would want to know who else might want to influence the election and why they would leave fingerprints that point to the Russians. That’s why I say until we know more about how the intelligence community came to this conclusion we don’t know whether it is Russian inspired or a false flag.”
Former UN ambassador John Bolton is right! We just dont’ know! Do you really think IF Russia was involved they would send in the “smart” team to ONLY hack Hillary’s emails and NOT our election? Come on man! It could have been a number of countries…Russia, Korea, China…you name it! Are you forgetting Hillary exposed our national security by having a private email server in her home?
If we really want to get to the bottom of this, we will need an independent investigation. Unfortunately Americans are going to have to wait until AFTER Trump’s inauguration. You certainly don’t expect Obama to set this up do you? Obama’s goal is just to put doubt in Americans’ minds about the vulnerability of the election results.
Here’s what President-elect Donald Trump posted on Twitter:
Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy theory!
Unless you catch “hackers” in the act, it is very hard to determine who was doing the hacking. Why wasn’t this brought up before election?
Good question!!!! Let’s face it the real evidence or truth will most likely all point back to Obama and Hillary and leaked information from insiders:
H/T BizPac Review:
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
Murray, who is a close associate of Wikileaks head Julian Assange, explained it further on his website.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
Sign up to get alerts from Joe!