Liberalism is a Mental Illness Which is Dangerous to Future Generations

0

Liberalism seems to have this desire to be acceptable to all things and unquestionably no absolutes. There literally doesn’t seem to be any line that they aren’t willing to cross.

Look at how liberals want to blame terrorist attacks on climate change and a lack of jobs for them. How does someone think that a lack of a job would turn someone into a psychotic killer? It is beyond me.

Now liberals want to understand pedophilia and try to excuse it. This is certainly not in any way an acceptable discussion. We don’t negotiate with terrorists (ok, Obama does, but normal people don’t) and there should be no way we negotiate with these predators of children.

We have let the mental illness of liberalism continue on long enough in our society. It is beyond time to say that it is not acceptable and for the sake of our children we are not going to take it anymore.

Check it out:

rights

EVIDENCE has emerged that the views of the Pedophile Information Exchange influenced policy-making at the National Council for Civil Liberties when it was run by former Labor Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt.

PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “pedophile love”.

Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs. Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of pedophilia result in lasting damage.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and pedophile.”

Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974 and 1983. After days of intense pressure, the former Labor MP for Leicester West finally admitted last week the NCCL was “naive and wrong” over its ties to PIE.

Continue reading: Express

It is disgusting that this is even a discussion. Do liberals even think about this as they are speaking or just try and outdo each other with their utopia of acceptance?

Sometimes you like to try and understand what your enemy is thinking so that you can know how to defeat them. But in this instance it is just pure lust and evil.

I have trouble tolerating this kind of talk. What do you think we should do? What can we do? I understand we have freedom of speech, but this is encouraging the harm of our children.

About Author

Jay Taylor is Senior Vice President of Political Strategy at Liberty Alliance and a graduate of West Virginia University with an MBA and Computer Engineering degrees. Jay oversees the popular websites Conservative Byte and Patriot Update.

Send this to friend