Evolution Debunked: NASA Proves Planets and Other Objects in the Solar System Don’t Exist

0

Under current Evolutionary models, decades of evidence discovered by NASA proves that many of the items, including some planets, in our solar system cannot exist.

It has been many decades since man decided the evolutionary model. It basically says that everything started in one “mass of something” and has over 40 something billion years, evolved to where we are now at the end of 2015.

We have had many decades of throwing things up in the sky farther and farther until we have reached incredible distances.

Evolutionists tell us that all things started with a single mass and the Evolutionary process has brought before us the incredibly complex world we live in Today!

Evolutionists tell us that all things started with a single mass and the Evolutionary process has brought before us the incredibly complex world we live in Today!

When man began putting together evolutionary theories, he had little technology, we have only this year finally visited Pluto and that only from cameras above.

NASA RELEASES NEW IMAGES: “ANTARCTICA IS GROWING, NOT SHRINKING

There are many items of evidence that NASA has found over the decades with probes, satellites, shuttles and stations, that do not fit at all the model of a great expansion from a single mass to the EXTREMELY complicated system of life, let alone the organization of solar systems and galaxies.

The best evolutionary models say that many of the planets in our solar system should not exist. Yet they are there.

Before we go any further. This article is written with a mentality that there is a Divine Creator, an architect of the creation. There will be many who read this article that dismiss that premise. I encourage you wholeheartedly to debate your reasons for denying this premise.

Yet, that is not the premise. The premise is that it is severely impossible to end up with the incredibly organized and detailed world we live in, arriving there by evolving from a single “Mass of Something. The premise is that scientists have found scientific evidence that it is impossible as well.

Watch the video. Explain where the evidence is faulty.

However let me warn you, the moment you leave debating the premise and turn to  personal attacks, use ad-hominem, and begin to name call, you will have then declared your own defeat. This is the number one tactic used when one has no grasp of the issue or has no answer to rebut the issue at hand.

“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”  ~ Socrates

I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left.” Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

So..you know…just had to get that out of the way.

In Romans 1:20, Paul says you can know there is a Creator by looking at the Creation.

The evolutionist says that the the five billion species of life, scientists claim have existed, all came from a single mass over billions of years. Tis theory was designed to answer the question, where do we come from. It does so to find a way that explains a way around a creator. But it leaves the original question unanswered, “Where does it come from?” This is a tactic, not a proof.

The basic premise of "It all started as a single mass.", "It all came from a single spark of life." still does not explain where that mass came from in the first place. Seems to me to be easier to get an ant hill out of a firework!

The basic premise of “It all started as a single mass.”, “It all came from a single spark of life.” still does not explain where that mass came from in the first place.
Seems to me to be easier to get an ant hill out of a firework!

The basic premise of “It all started as a single mass.”, “It all came from a single spark of life.” still does not explain where that mass came from in the first place.

The intricacy of life so is incredibly vast.  All you have to do is look at the most simple, and the incredible intricacy of life is still seen. Multiply that by the billions of complicated, organized and detailed life forms, and common sense begins to show us that such perfection could not happen by accident. It is absurd.

The human eye, the bird wing, the oak tree and the eagle, the vegetable world, the fruit world, the grasses themselves have some incredible stories to tell.

Just in order to begin at a single spark of life, and to arrrive where we are today, that very simple “spark” has to “evolve” two very complex items immediately. Sustenance and reproduction.

Otherwise that accidental single “spark” of life would have just disappeared.

Even today, sustenance and reproduction are not always easy. But those two things are needed for life. That single “spark” did not have 100,000 years to evolve these two very sophisticated concepts. Without something to sustain any life form, it withers and dies.

It needs water, nutrients, air, sunlight, and/or any other number of items to sustain itself.

Humans need all of these. That first spark of life needed “something”, and a way to process that “something”.

We have ZERO examples out of the five billion species of life scientists claim have existed, of a form that lives perpetually and never dies.

The basic form of life, the cell, dies. When they all die, the item withers and rots.

We also have ZERO examples out of the five billion species of life scientists claim have existed, of a life form that had a life span longer than a an incredible fraction of  billions of years they claim is the total.

That single “spark” of life had to learn how to reproduce, or like Marty McFly in “Back to the Future“, life itself would have just disappeared.

I ask any scientist, no matter how smart,

“Just how long did that first single spark of life live before it added the complexity of sustenance and reproduction to the evolutionary mix?”

DNA is found in every life from including mold. By evolutionary method, that very complex piece of life had to be present when that evolving life form had yet split into plants, animals, bacteria and penicillin.

Wait…it did not evolve into penicillin. There was a creator for penicillin. I wonder when evolution was going to evolve the mold into penicillin… amoxycillin.

Then we leave the evolution of life and follow over to the evolution of where life resides.

The universe, our galaxy, our Solar System, our planet, and our plot of land on the earth where we reside along with the plants and animals around us.  How did it arrive from that same individual "Mass of Something" that evolution so heavily relies on. (Beyond the glow of the city lights, a universe awaits. | by ArchesNPS)

The universe, our galaxy, our Solar System, our planet, and our plot of land on the earth where we reside along with the plants and animals around us. How did it arrive from that same individual “Mass of Something” that evolution so heavily relies on. (Beyond the glow of the city lights, a universe awaits. | by ArchesNPS)

The Universe.

 

The universe, our galaxy, our Solar System, our planet, and our plot of land on the earth where we reside along with the plants and animals around us.

How did it arrive from that same individual “Mass of Something” that evolution so heavily relies on.

Evolutionists have been telling us the same basic story for decades, when for the whole of the history of man, most scientist payed homage to a Creator.

Scientist were studying the creation and how a Creator made things work.

Today, scientists study the creation within the concept that all things started with a single mass and the evolutionary process has brought before us the incredibly complex world we live in today!

The problem is that as time goes on, we learn. There have been an incredible number of discoveries over just the last two decades that have given significant pause to the “Evolutionary Theory” as it relates to life, the planet, and the solar system and universe.

Man has been throwing things into space to learn about the world we live in for many decades. Boy have we learned.

From the first intercontinental ballistic missile and Sputnik in 1957, to the space station and to the first flyby of Pluto in 2015, we have been learning.

There are many items that NASA has found over the decades with probes, satellites, shuttles and stations, that do not fit at all the model of a great expansion from a single mass to the EXTREMELY complicated system of life on this earth, let alone the organization of solar systems and galaxies.

There are many items that NASA has found over the decades with probes, satellites, shuttles and stations, that do not fit at all the model of a great expansion from a single mass to the EXTREMELY complicated system of life on this earth, let alone the organization of solar systems and galaxies.

There are many items of discovery that NASA has found over the decades with probes, satellites, shuttles and stations, that do not fit the model of a great expansion.

Spike Psarris entered the United States’ military space program an atheist and an evolutionist. He left a creationist and a Christian.

NASA continually discovered evidences that the atheists cannot explain let alone spin. But they do, the answers are always the same for every piece of evidence.

#1. An Asteroid Hit It!

#2. Evolution has nothing to do with astronomy.

(Yes, folks, it is actually argued that the scientists who study and explain the universe do not start with a “Single Mass of Something” that evolved into a place habitable for life at which point that “single spark” of life evolved with that expanding universe to evolve into what we have today.)

In effort to refute Spike Psarris compilations of scientific evidence, it is actually stated that, “Evolution has nothing to do with astronomy.” (<<~~Note the author debunked ZERO of Psarris’ evidences. He only complained about the term that Psarris uses to describe the process, one that everyone else understood, I might add.)

Yes, crazies, we know that many astronomers do not always call it evolution. That would be actually very smart to stay away from that word wouldn’t it? But there are countless examples of the astrophysical world using the term “evolution” in relation to the solar system and the universe.

But we are still talking about a process that starts with a single mass and evolves into what we have today. Of course who would deny that the evolution of life and the universe, as well as the planet and galaxy, are all their own separate subjects.

It is all the same timeline from single mass to today. Did God create our solar system less than 10,000 years ago, as the Bible says? Or did it form all by itself from a cloud of gas 46,00,000,000 years ago, as secular astronomers claim? Which account of history is true?

Spike Psarris puts together a timeline of NASA’s scientific discoveries in space that support the Biblical account. Each planet in our solar system defies the evolutionary model in multiple ways.

In both our created solar system and our created stars and galaxies Psarris covers enough evidence to put the WHOLE of evolution on a quickly dissolving foundation.

Doesn’t it make easier sense that something bigger than ourselves designed and created it than it started as one mass and evolved into both the inanimate objects in the Universe as well as all forms of life? Does me!

Religion? That is another story. Man has been messing up religion since time began, but that is not an argument against a Creator that has a plan.

http://www.creationastronomy.com

In this video, you’ll tour our magnificent solar system. You’ll visit each planet through more than 200 beautiful photographs and graphics from NASA and other sources. You will see how each planet uniquely testifies of its Creator!

About Author

Scott Osborn is a Writer, Preacher, Political activist, as well as the Social Media Director for the TV Comedy Show, The Flipside with Michael Loftus. Scott hosts several radio shows, including the wildly popular “Conover U” starring Rodney Lee & the Preacher..

Send this to friend