BAN Shariah Law, One State At A Time – Assert Tenth Amendment Rights

0

JUST when you thought that Islamists in America can’t be stopped without full-out armed conflict  –  which should absolutely remain on the table – along comes an American weapon, one which is legally enshrined in the Constitution! 

NOW, patriots are well aware that leftists and Islamists couldn’t care less about Constitutional rights. Okay. However, that doesn’t negate the fact that a particular avenue shouldn’t be used to the maximum extent, exerting MASSIVE pressure upon each and every state legislature. Agreed?

THAT is, unless Shariah Law is an attractive option.

Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 

THE framers of the Constitution foresaw the dangers from a leadership which opposes individual freedom. They understood that a fear of losing control would cause them to violate basic liberties. Therefore, said leaders needed to be kept in check. Hence, federalism.

AND those of us with a grounding in political science and the Constitution recognize the push and pull between federal and states’ rights because it is a never-ending struggle. It is not for nothing. No matter. 

INHERENTLY, the Tenth Amendment of the Bill of Rights is very clear, relegating to the states (and its citizens) certain rights, most of which are to ensure protection from federal encroachment. And it is this federal control which leftists (anti-Americans in toto) count on to rein in individual rights. Is it any wonder that power accrued in the hands of the federal government is something to be VERY fearful of?  

Eagle Rising's photo.

SO it is into this cauldron of fire, its opening, that Islamists utilize every Federal pressure point to advance Shariah Law in America. Under the guise of Freedom of Religion – coupled with heavy lifting from HUSSEIN Obama and his Brotherhoodpoint people – its basis has already infiltrated the finance industry, the education system, courts and more. The (linked) proofs are indisputable.

MORE specifically, the Center For Security Policy is rife with evidence which expounds upon the direct threats posed by Shariah Law’s insidious boring into America. Nation-changing. Destroying. Make no mistake, the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s goal is global dominance, and without America’s “compliance” said swathe cannot be realized in full. Hence, the phased plan.”

Phase 1: Establishment of an elite Muslim leadership, while raising taqwa , or Islamic consciousness, in the Muslim community.

Phase 2: Creation of Islamic institutions the leadership can control, along with the formation of autonomous Muslim enclaves.

Phase 3: Infiltration and Islamization of America’s political, social, economic and educational systems, forming a shadow state within the state. Escalation of religious conversions to Islam.

Phase 4: Openly hostile public confrontation over US policies, including rioting, and militant demands for special rights and accommodations for Muslims.

Phase 5: Final conflict and overthrow (jihad).

WITHOUT any reservations, several high level counter terror contacts have come to the same conclusion: the Brotherhood has already completed the first 3 phases. They are in the midst of the 4th phase, and this is where the militant demands by CAIR (and with a cooperating FED) and its surrogate groups come into play. Time and again, in a hostile manner, they openly challenge America’s policies, demanding special rights and accommodations. This is merely one sampling (August 2014) and the tip of their spear.

CAIR-Ibrahim-Hooper-Fooling-establishment

Islamic activists that strong-armed the FBI to purge anti-terrorism training material considered “offensive” to Muslims have made their next wave of demands, which include an overhaul in the way all law enforcement officers are trained in the United States.

The coalition of influential and politically-connected Muslim rights groups is demanding that the Obama administration implement a mandatory retraining program for all federal, state and local law enforcement officials who may have been subjected to materials they deem “biased and discriminatory” against Muslims. There must also be an audit of all federal law enforcement and intelligence gathering training and educational materials to identify and remove information that could exhibit bias against any race, ethnicity, religion or national origin, the groups demand.

Additionally, the administration must pursue disciplinary action against agents and officials who engage in discriminatory conduct as well as those responsible for the anti-Muslim training materials. Finally, the coalition insists that all federal funding to local and state law enforcement agencies be withheld unless they ban all training materials considered to be biased against race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. In short, these empowered Muslim activists want to dictate how our nation’s law enforcement agencies operate at every level.

The outrageous demands were made this month in a letter to Lisa O. Monaco, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. Among the signatories is the terrorist front organization Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which has repeatedly proven that it wields tremendous power in the Obama administration. Founded in 1994 by three Middle Eastern extremists, CAIR got the FBI to purge anti-terrorism material determined to be offensive to Muslims. Judicial Watch uncovered that scandal last summer and obtained hundreds of pages of FBI documents with details of the arrangement. JW also published a special in-depth reporton the subject in December.

CAIR also got several police departments in President Obama’s home state of Illinois to cancel essential counterterrorism courses over accusations that the instructor was anti-Muslim. The course was called “Islamic Awareness as a Counter-Terrorist Strategy” and departments in Lombard, Elmhurst and Highland Park caved into CAIR’s demands. The group responded with a statement commending officials for their “swift action in addressing the Muslim community’s concerns.” CAIR has wielded its power in a number of other cases during the Obama presidency, including blocking an FBI probe involving the radicalization of young Somali men in the U.S. and pressuring the government to file discrimination lawsuits against employers who don’t accommodate Muslims in the workplace.

Other signatories include the powerful open borders group Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), Muslim Advocates, the Sikh Coalition, Women in Islam Inc., the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), to name a few. The group’s claim that recent administration directives to promote multicultural and diversity sensitivity training in law enforcement aren’t enough because they don’t specifically address anti-Muslim materials.

“Without executive branch actions, including those we recommend below, trainings that perpetuate gross stereotypes and false information about Islam and Muslims will continue to proliferate at the state and local level,” the letter says. It continues: “The use of anti-Muslim trainers and materials is not only highly offensive, disparaging the faith of millions of Americans, but leads to biased policing that targets individuals and communities based on religion, not evidence of wrongdoing.” This will foster fear and suspicion of Muslims and will lead to an increase in discrimination, bullying, harassment and anti-Muslim violence, the letter asserts.

AGAIN, all of the above has two converging end points: the destruction of America, and the concomitant insertion of Shariah Law. De facto, this turns the U.S. into theShariah States of America. Plain and simple.

SO what’s to be done? Well, back to the Tenth Amendment…state by state…

IN Feb. 2015 it was reported:

sislam-will-dominateMuslims are determined to push their religious doctrines on the American people.

Muslim cab drivers in Minneapolis and several airports have kicked out blind passengers with guide dogs (dogs are “unclean” in Islam). Somali Muslims on welfare have demanded that their free food comply with “Islamic requirements”. Muslim groups have demanded that their women be permitted to wear full face and body-coverings, even on drivers licenses.

And Muslim pressure groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations(CAIR) have pushed to force Sharia Law on our courts and law enforcement — withsome U.S. judges insanely agreeing to comply. A New Jersey judge recently cited Sharia Law in refusing to grant a Muslim woman a restraining order in a horrible case of sexual assault and abuse, because her husband said his abuse was acceptable “according to his Muslim beliefs.” In Texas, a group of unlicensed Muslim “judges” have set up an “Islamic Tribunal” which they say will “resolve disputes” in law, family and businesses using, of course, Sharia Lawnot the U.S. Constitution.

Islamic-Tribunal-Texas

Well some states are fighting back. 16 U.S. states have introduced legislation to ban or restrict Sharia law since 2013.

The list was compiled by the radical, terror-linked CAIR — which meant it to condemn the states, but to most Americans, it will bolster those states as somewhere they would want to live.

Ironically, CAIR claims they oppose Sharia Law in America. So why is it that any time a state wants to ban Sharia from inside its boundaries, CAIR fights it and cries “Islamophobia”?

Because they want Muslims to only be subject to Sharia, not our laws. Herman Mustafa Carroll, executive director of the Dallas CAIR branch was most revealing when hebrazenly said: “If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land.” 

Well the following states are saying: no damn way.

Alabama became the latest state to ban Sharia law when voters overwhelmingly passed a measure adding an amendment to the state constitution. CAIR said that the motion wasvirulently racist” and “outright hostility towards Muslims.” Alabamans apparently didn’t care what they said.

The list of all 16 states are:

  • Alabama (two bills)
  • Arkansas
  • Florida (two bills)
  • Indiana (two bills)
  • Iowa
  • Kentucky
  • Mississippi (four bills)
  • Missouri (two bills)
  • North Carolina
  • Oklahoma (seven bills)
  • South Carolina (two bills)
  • Texas (six bills)
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wyoming (two bills)

And hopefully in 2015, the list will get longer.

It depends on you. Tell your state reps you want Sharia banned in your state next.

AIN’T that the truth.

WHILE this site is hardly underestimating – recognizing better than most – theinroads gained by Islamists in America, the fact remains that those who oppose living under the boot of Islam have options. Yes, they do. Nevertheless, only a small window of opportunity is left to keep Shariah at bay.

RESULTANT, since Islam’s thrust will dissipate without Shariah Law it is imperative to cut it off at its path. And being that its final entry is dependent upon creating a parallel legal system throughout each state, Muslims are desperate to insert its basis wherever they reside. In effect, Islam becomes the law of the land wherever Shariah is implanted, irrespective of whether or not Americans understand what has taken place.

CONSEQUENTIALLY, the questions become: since America’s framers had the foresight to create the Bill of Rights – handing the states the power to pass laws against federal intrusion, including a foreign legal system and additional anti-American measures – what’s the problem?

EXTRAPOLATING further, isn’t it in the national interest to wage UNRELENTING campaigns, state by state, to ensure passage against foreign laws, rather than to wait until Shariah envelops the nation? Rest assured, any delays will result in an eventual bloody war spilling into the streets of America, once Muslims feel empowered by their gains – standing unopposed – state by state. Intrinsically, said American inaction will (albeit, unintentionally) unleash “Phase 5″ cited above.

AS to a pre-emptive course of action, well, it’s a no-brainer.

 

About Author

Adina Kutnicki

Adina Kutnicki is an investigative journalist and independent op-ed contributor to various Zionist and Conservative media outlets. She contributed to an in-depth investigative series at FrontPage Magazine with Lee Kaplan from 2003-2007. They are still working together. Her op-eds have been featured at American Thinker, Israel National News,Israel Insider, The Jewish Press, MidEast Outpost, The Freeman Center For Strategic Studies, HONENU – Providing Legal Aid To Israeli Soldiers & Civilians In Distress, JEWSNEWS.co.il(http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/10/why-is-drunk-driving-treated-more-leniently-than-assault-with-a-deadly-weapon-op-ed-by-adina-kutnicki-featured-at-jewsnews-co-il/) as well as at other sites. Some interviews include: The Inquisitr Interviews Adina Kutnicki: The Reality Of Life For An Israeli Patriot and ‘The Muslim Brotherhood’s Quest For Global Dominance – An Interview With Adina Kutnicki.’ Her recent book review On A Wing From The Holy Land [Review Of An Exciting New Novel About The Spiritual Journey Of An Israeli Woman] was also spotlighted at Inquisitr. In addition, she is the Israel Administrator at Islam Exposed Online Her blog - www.adinakutnicki.com - received a ‘Watcher of Weasels’ Award - see within – scroll down to ‘Non-Council’ winners. Her full profile can be found at - http://adinakutnicki.com/about/

Send this to friend