READERS, the following interview is very timely and speaks for itself. Continue below…
INTRODUCTION TO PART ONE OF THE INQUISITR’S INTERVIEW WITH ADINA KUTNICKI
Israel is now surrounded by well-armed bitter enemies, none of whom are calling for a Palestinian state to exist side-by-side in peace with the Jewish state of Israel. Instead, they have all called for the destruction of Israel and the creation of an Islamic Palestinian state from the river to the sea. These enemies include Hamas in Gaza, Syria and Lebanon in the North and the Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria.
In the north, Syrian troops, Hezbollah and ISIS have set up positions in the Golan Heights near the Israeli border. Lebanon, ruled by Hezbollah, has literally thousands of Iranian-supplied rockets aimed at Israel’s civilian population centers, which they will launch any time Iran gives them a green light. Hamas in Gaza is bragging that they are rearming and digging new tunnels, and they have openly declared they intend to wage a war of extermination against every Jew on earth. The Palestinian Authority says whatever they have to in English to keep the foreign aid flowing, but in Arabic, they too talk about eliminating Israel, and there are several heavily armed terror group in Judea and Samaria that are all affiliated with the Palestinian Authority.
Making matters even more complicated, the leaders of the BDS movement have said they will not stop calling for sanctions on Israel when Palestine becomes a nation. They are demanding the full right of return for all 5.5 million so-called Palestinian refugees as a condition of ending the demand for sanctions on Israel. This flood of Arab Muslims would be a death blow to the existence of a Jewish state.
At the moment, Egypt and Jordan are dealing with their own terror groups who are making life very difficult for al Sisi in Egypt and King Abdullah in Jordan. However, should the rest of Israel’s neighbors and their assorted state-approved terror groups launch a coordinated attack on Israel, there is a strong possibility Egypt and Jordan would attack Israel as well.
WOLFF BACHNER: Adina, considering the dangers facing Israel, plus the threat of ISIS in Iraq, Libya and Syria, how can any sane world leader expect Israel to surrender more land, divide Jerusalem, and create a 23rd Arab state at this time?
ADINA KUTNICKI: Wolff, thank you for inviting me back to discuss some of the most pressing issues facing Israel, since its modern rebirth in 1948.
In point of fact, her enemies (near and far) continuously “forget” that Israel has been the nation state of the Jewish people for upwards of 4,000 years, and this convenient amnesia is not for nothing. Instead, they mendaciously claim that the state of Israel is recompense for the six million souls slaughtered during the Holocaust! Have mercy.
Now, a preponderance of Israel’s detractors will grudgingly concur that Jews are, for the most part, an intelligent people, albeit, some more so than others. Therefore, logic dictates that an intellectually endowed group would hardly settle for a sliver of land, one which is barely the size of New Jersey, never mind its total lack of strategic depth. Alternatively, the flip side becomes: were they collectively dropped on their heads to agree to “settle” in, of all places, the fiery Mid East? By extrapolation, those who are up in arms (due to the “stubborn” claim of Jewish ownership/title to Israel) shouldn’t they be curious, querying: to begin with, why are Jews insisting on living within this postage stamp sized land mass? Not only that, but since Israel (up until its recent gas find) is barren of natural resources (relying on its tremendous Jewish intellectual capital for its stunning success) — – again, why would Jews (myself included, living in Israel close to 7 years) want to reside in the midst of the barbaric Middle East?
Furthermore, have any of Israel’s vitriolic critics bothered to examine: where does the word Jew derive from? Well, the fact of the matter is Jews are called Jews due to the tribe of Judah. Consequentially, the region of Judea (originated from Judah) is the mountainous southern part of the historic land of Israel; the Jewish inheritance. Incontrovertibly, irrespective of all else, the heartland of the Jewish people is Judea and Samaria. This is the truth within every realm which is based upon a factual standard; historically, biblically or legally. Case closed.
Egregiously, this is the same territory which is purposefully bastardized as the “West Bank”, all in order to rip the heart out of the Jewish people’s historical, biblical and legal title to Israel. The same ahistorical claim is laid to Jerusalem, Israel’s eternal capital, Zion.
Yet, before we proceed with your highly charged questions, it must also be internalized that the same dark forces encircling Israel are targeting America. Indeed, the entire west is in the cross-hairs of Sunni and Shia Islamic jihadists, most especially the “Big Satan” and the “Little Satan”.
Resultant, within any rational discourse, the hegemonic ambitions of Arabs/Muslims should, on its face, obliterate all demands for Israel to forfeit even a centimeter of Jewish land. Besides, the bullet proof Jewish title to the entire land of Israel (intrinsically, Judea and Samaria and Jerusalem) is more than enough ammunition to shoot down the braying jackals. For the record, some readers may recall a tangential discussion in our first interview (Oct. 2013), The Reality Of Life For An Israeli Patriot.
WOLFF BACHNER: Now that the world is witnessing first hand the homicidal explosion of violence and Jihad in the Middle East, and the massive increase in the threats to annihilate the Jewish state, shouldn’t responsible world leaders call for a halt in the peace process until ISIS is defeated, Hamas is disarmed, Iran stops arming Israel enemies to the teeth, and the thousands of advanced Iranian missiles aimed at Israel’s cities are destroyed?
ADINA KUTNICKI: Assuredly, this has not stopped so-called sane world leaders from obsessively clamoring for Israel to relinquish its historical heartland, all for the sake of the “peace process”. Mind you, the only “peace” which has evolved since the “process” began has been thousands of pieces of (mostly Jewish) body parts blown to smithereens, and countless others maimed for life. And never mind those who are severely traumatized, plagued with PTSD and associated distress disorders, due to their obdurate quest for “peace.”
Atop said proven disastrous outcomes, and in light of the nation’s encirclement by Hamas in Gaza, Syria and Lebanon in the North and the Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria, and with Syrian troops, Hezbollah and ISIS positioning in the Golan Heights near the Israeli border, it is mind boggling to conceive that any non-malignant world leader (including some of Israel’s too) would push her to give up even a centimeter from the tiny ancestral homeland. As always, the salient question becomes: why?
Basically, western leaders are playing a numbers game, and the Arabs/Muslims win hands down. Placating them, despite their barbarism, manifests in two directions. Firstly, there are more financial deals to be made with a billion plus people, as opposed to a paltry few million. This is despite the fact that western collusion with the Arab/Muslim world has a direct hand in what they excel at best; the import/export of jihad through money laundering via narco-terror and various criminal enterprises. The main umbrella under which they operate is the Muslim Brotherhood; a Mafia-like syndicate of jihadi enterprises, which, at times, traverses with Hezbollah’s narco-terror networks F/B/O Iran.
The above is accomplished through a maze-like hydra of financial institutions throughout the west, as the dirty money wends its way into all corners of the world, wherever funds for jihad are required. Yes, “it be” true, there are many western leaders (political and others) who are accomplices, and HSBC is one such “slush” house.
Secondly, it is not inconsequential that the side most willing to use barbaric methods is the one which demands (and receives) appeasement. In other words, even though experience has proven that feeding the poisonous snakes will not keep the dangers at bay, still, the course of least resistance has its appeal to a mostly opportunistic, craven, highly intimidated western leadership. Couple the above with some who are rooting for Islam’s triumph, consequently, the waters become red and overflowing with innocent blood.
Still, in a highly Orwellian manner, Israel is accused of being the “bully” in the Mid East neighborhood, by dint of the fact that it has the strongest military force. Even so, if this scurrilous appendage was remotely correct, the discussion herein would be moot. DOA. How so?
Assuredly, Israel has the military capability to crush its menacing neighbors, and from several diverging force multipliers. On the other hand, time and again, Israel’s political leaders (unduly influenced by the nation’s leftist-driven media and non-elected, but very powerful, self-appointed elitists, be they from the academic, legal or cultural realm) have shied away from victory. Why?
The answers are varied and complex, but a few intrinsic factors are noteworthy. As detailed within our last interview (Sept. 2014), ISIS, Islam and Obama: Understanding The Threat To The Free world, PM Netanyahu is tethered (for a multiplicity of reasons) to Washington’s harness, even though he is at odds with the Obama administration regarding Iran. You don’t say…
WOLFF BACHNER: And speaking of responsible world leaders, why isn’t the Prime Minster of Israel bringing up these serious issues with the nations involved in the peace process and especially with Obama and demanding an end to all military threats to Israel before Israel will negotiate again? Is he trying too hard to appease Obama and the various European talking heads, and by doing so, weakening Israel’s position even further in a peace process that is already an anti-Israeli charade?
ADINA KUTNICKI: It is this lock-step and debasing march which stopped him (during 9 years as PM, from 1996-1999 and 2009 -2015) from declaring victory over Hamas during the 2014 summer-long war, one which blanketed/blitzed the entire country with missile and rocket barrages. More indicting, instead of laying waste, years ago, to Iran’s mushrooming genocidal WMD program, he is still begging President Obama to lead the charge, knowing full well that he has no such intention. Chasing ghosts.
Inherently, he could have taken a page out of (the late) PM Menachem Begin’s playbook, when he defied President Carter and destroyed Iraq’s Osirak reactor. Now, as then, Washington issued threats to “cease and desist”, but one PM ignored said orders, while the other (continuously) caved. Statesmanship, or the lack thereof.
In the main, PM Netanyahu is best described as a “serial accommodator”, comparable to a badly battered wife who just can’t help herself from going back to her abuser, one last time, for more punishment. Now, others may tsk, tsk and opine: well, the POTUS is the big man in the arena, therefore, what can poor “Bibi” do but genuflect? Hogwash.
For the record, PM Menachem Begin didn’t have a problem executing what his mantle required of him; protecting Israel at ALL costs! Similarly, Israel’s first PM, David Ben-Gurion, gave Eisenhower the proverbial finger, when he launched a war in 1956 in concert with Britain and France against an increasingly belligerent Egypt. As always, Washington attempted to stay Israel’s hand. History repeats.
In furtherance to the above charge and indictment, whereas PM Ben-Gurion took on the U.S. when Israel was little more than a military pipsqueak, PM Netanyahu behaves as if Israel is a vassal state. This is the case even though he has at his disposal the most adept forces in the region, let alone technologically advanced. Hence, the question is not one of actual force strength, but one of inner and moral fortitude. Hmm.
At its base, the moment that PM Netanyahu conceded to a PA (terror) state (during his speech at Bar Ilan University in 2009, two and a half months into his tenure…regardless of how he framed it), the fact of the matter is that he gave Israel’s “kosher” stamp of approval to carve a 23 rd Arab state out of the Jewish heartland. This historical injury lands at his doorstep. Agreed, previous PM’s have been equally appeasing and beyond injurious, but the imprimatur for the above became cemented under his watch. No doubt.
Thus, he weakened Israel’s position within (already hostile, pro Arab) international forums, once he gutted the nation’s core standing. Realistically, are others supposed to be “more Catholic than the Pope”, so to speak? Not only that, why should they disagree with Israel’s PM, in effect, after he already conceded (his “reasoning” doesn’t count for a damn) to the “rights” of the so-called Palestinians? Unforgivable.
Most significantly, the “peace process” was irrefutably designed to weaken Israel on numerous fronts, rendering her a walking corpse. This is hardly a secret.
” As early as August 1968, Arafat defined the PLO’s strategic objective as “the transfer of all resistance bases” into the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, occupied by Israel during the June 1967 war, “so that the resistance may be gradually transformed into a popular armed revolution.” This, he reasoned, would allow the PLO to undermine Israel’s way of life by “preventing immigration and encouraging emigration … destroying tourism … weakening the Israeli economy and diverting the greater part of it to security requirements … [and]creating and maintaining an atmosphere of strain and anxiety that will force the Zionists to realize that it is impossible for them to live in Israel.”
The Oslo accords enabled the PLO to achieve in one fell swoop what it had failed to attain through many years of violence and terrorism. Here was Israel, just over a decade after destroying the PLO’s military infrastructure in Lebanon, asking the Palestinian organization, at one of the lowest ebbs in its history, to establish a real political and military presence—not in a neighboring Arab country but right on its doorstep. Israel even was prepared to arm thousands of (hopefully reformed) terrorists who would be incorporated into newly established police and security forces charged with asserting the PLO’s authority throughout the territories”…..
Unarguably, PM Netanyahu is the best orator on the world stage. He proved it on several occasions, most recently, at his speech to Congress on March 3, 2015. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, he is a highly gifted and polished communicator. But his commanding presence is both a byproduct of having been a special forces commando in Israel’s elite Sayeret Matkal Unit (General Reconnaissance Staff), coupled with the natural confidence gleaned from being a top graduate of MIT, one of the most acclaimed universities in the world. Not too shabby, brawn and brains alike.
To wit, it is not unreasonable to posit (and to expect) that a man of his inestimable gifts should utilize them (unlike at the aforementioned Bar Ilan speech) to highlight ALL the reasons why a PA (terror) state is a non-starter, regardless of any cockamamie caveats of “demilitarization”, in and of itself an illegal demand! For heaven’s sake…
Conclusively, to round out the first part of my interview, let me leave the readers with the following concrete shout out: as to the charge sheet that PM Netanyahu is essentially spineless, I would like nothing more than to be proven wrong, as would millions of others. Intrinsically, he can redeem himself without any oratory flourishes, and this can be accomplished by veering into immediate “action-mode.”
MEMO to PM Netanyahu: way past time to stop talking and to give the order – bombs away! Don’t fall short by caving. Muster your courage. Otherwise, (Jewish) history will be very unforgiving.
INTRODUCTION TO PART TWO OF THE INQUISITR’S INTERVIEW WITH ADINA KUTNICKI
As we reflect on the trials and tribulations of the last six years since a little-known US Senator from Illinois was proclaimed the Second Coming at his presidential inauguration, we see a world in chaos under the leadership of Barack Hussein Obama. When we examine the global repercussions of Obama’s time in office, a frightening pattern emerges. Every corner of the planet has experienced a never-ending cycle of violent Jihad and Islamic terrorism as America’s President embraces the Muslim Brotherhood, apologizes for America’s past behavior, and throws one ally after the other under the proverbial bus.
No longer able to blame Bush, Obama’s presidency is marred by the obliteration of one Arab nation after the other at the hands of ISIS and an ever-increasing roster of like-minded Islamic terror organizations. Millions have fled their homes to struggle for survival in refugee camps or starve to death on lonely mountain tops. Parents have literally flung their own children to their doom from the heights rather than allow them to fall into the hands of the demented child molesters of ISIS, who sell girls as young as six as sex-slaves.
Happy to fill the void created by Mr. Obama’s unconscionable decision to completely withdraw the American military from Iraq and his misguided campaign of destruction in Libya, the Twelvers of Iran now control Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, and Gaza. The Ayatollahs who rule Iran with an iron fist are quite content to be the world’s leading financiers of Islamic terrorism as they make speeches calling for the total destruction of Israel and the annihilation of the Jewish people.
Now a lame duck president, Obama is showing his true colors to Israel. While he once proclaimed, “Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided,” he has made a mockery of his words. No longer worried about alienating voters who support Israel, he demands the Jewish state divides Jerusalem, returns to the indefensible borders of 1948, and creates a 23rd Arab Islamic nation in Judea and Samaria. While constantly browbeating Israel for even building Jewish homes in Jerusalem, Obama has not said a single word about Abbas announcing to the world that the nation of Palestine will be 100 percent Jew-Free.
Israel faces the threat of total annihilation if Iran acquires deliverable atomic bombs and the slow death of the Jewish state if Palestine becomes a nation under the Obama peace initiative. As Israel struggles for its very survival in a world that deliberately forgets the United Nations reestablished Israel in 1948 specifically to be the national homeland of the Jewish people, a relentless Obama demands that Israeli leaders shut up, do what he tells them and trust him alone with Israel’s very existence.
WOLFF BACHNER: How can the elected leaders of America’s closest allies, many of whom have been victims of Obama’s temper tantrums, insulting lectures and juvenile bullying, remain silent while Obama continues to ignore the Islamist war on the entire non-Muslim world?
ADINA KUTNICKI: Wolff, oh my. In no uncertain terms, your questions are akin to rapid fire exchanges of ammunition. Regardless, I will dive into them sans any armor, sugar coating or PC balderdash. Pointedly, it is through conducting said interviews, depressing as they are, that I hope to offer Inquisitr’s readers additional insight into some of the most pressing issues of our time. Nevertheless, I apologize in advance for being the (constant) bearer of bad news, and for any ensuing headache and heartburn.
From the onset, discussions relative to Obama, his nexus to Islamic terror and Israel piggyback each other. As a result, some of my analysis will, by extrapolation, intersect between segmented questions. Subsequent answers are, de facto, inter-linking parts of the same (geo-political) jigsaw puzzle.
That being said, in the main, western leaders are collectively “tired of fighting…tired of winning.” This self defeating (Orwellian) phrase was coined by none other than the most appeasing leader within Israel, ex President Peres. Tragically, there exists a laundry list of candidates who possess the requisite traits for such a distinctive appellation. However, Peres is in a class by himself, and the “honor” belongs to him. Readers may innocently inquire: why is he being singled out?
Acutely, Peres’s lengthy political life (refusing to retire gracefully from the political stage, despite all the wreckage and mangled body parts his “peace at all costs” train caused) is infused with the same sickness plaguing a preponderance of western leaders – an unholy addiction to appeasement. Therefore, he serves as their “poster boy”, the elder “statesman”. More specifically, he is treated like a rock star within Euro capitals and Washington’s leftist elite, hence, he must be unmasked. Birds of a feather.
Simply put, he ingrained within Israeli society the damnable “conceptzia” of appeasement, as a preferred way forward. KADIMA… קדימה. His ilk replaced unapologetic hard-core Zionism – a righteous and valued Jewish doctrine – and substituted surrender as a “strategic” and national imperative. Did you ever??
Resultant, since then, Zionists have paid (with no end in sight) in blood, sweat and tears for the fantasies of successive leaders. Now, does this sound like a gaggle of leaders (similar to their Euro counterparts) who are (mentally or morally) capable of raising their voices against ” Obama’s temper tantrums, insulting lectures and juvenile bullying while Obama continues to ignore the Islamist war on the entire non-Muslim world?”
Consequentially, the aforementioned damage is the deadly coinage paid for Peres’s (and others) “peace” illusions and delusions. Effectively, once “peaceniks” (aka leftists) become invested in their besieged mindsets, frankly, it is easier to separate pigs from their crap, instead of attempting to convince them to volte-face.
Along this dangerous trajectory, increasingly, as Islamic forces smell weakness, the west’s encirclement by Islamic jihad grows by leaps and bounds and in direct proportion. In the meanwhile, western leaders (Israel’s in the forefront) are gripped with a form of collective Stockholm Syndrome. Essentially, they are held captive by the biggest lie propagated (miss-educating) within Middle Eastern Studies Departments; the historical falsity of Orientalism.
Audaciously, through mendacious falsehoods, the late Edward Said was able to guilt (and game) western leaders (elected and non-elected) into paying penance for all the ills endemic within the Arab/Muslim world.
In other words, traditional U.S. allies, by and large, are liberal in outlook. We get that. However, liberalism, when coupled with Orientalism, becomes a recipe for western defeat. It is within this warped (mental and so-called historical) prism that barbarians morph into victims and victims become aggressors… Alice-in-Wonderland….through the looking glass too. Additionally, once you add into the tempest certain pressure points (exerted by unelected power players within the radical left), the notion of fighting for western values becomes a Herculean task. DOA.
Inherently, in order to struggle for ones national ethos, one has to believe that its concepts and underpinnings are worth fighting (possibly dying) for. Ominously, because traditional allied leaders place little (to zero) value in preserving western civilization, Obama can behave akin to both a blatant bully and a petulant child, secure in the knowledge that there will be no meaningful push back. PC (im)moral relativism/equivalence has catapulted the west to the brink. Yes, it has.
WOLFF BACHNER: Why do millions of American voters continue to support a duplicitous, deceitful President who blames the depraved crimes against humanity being perpetrated by the Qur’an waving Islamist butchers of ISIS, Boko Haram and dozens of other Islamofascist terror groups on an imaginary lack of career opportunities and good jobs in the Islamic world?
ADINA KUTNICKI: Specifically, as to why a segment of American voters still support Obama (my “tribe” included), well, the same combination of historical and moral blindness permeates the electorate, as much as it does western leadership. Not only that, but it is decidedly more comfortable to believe that Islamic barbarism has nothing to do with Islam, rather than the reverse. Additionally, we can’t afford to discount basic ignorance, so let’s be honest: not all folks can separate fact from fiction. Thereby, they believe Obama and gang’s fairytale stories: yes, Islam is a “religion of peace.” Dumb as oxen.
Yet, an added caveat to their willingness to “see no Islamic evil, hear no Islamic evil” (regardless of the unyielding butchering) simply dovetails into the “gimme gimme…everything for free” crowd. Ask yourselves: how could it be that countless Americans value free cell phones (and attendant services) above national concerns?
In gut-wrenching seriousness, you cannot make this stuff up. Crazy.
Alas, those of us who value hard work (while maintaining a healthy dose of patriotism, perhaps, coupled with Zionism), in a nutshell, are considered whack jobs.
WOLFF BACHNER: In your opinion, is Obama trying to force Israel to surrender to a peace plan that would endanger the very survival of the Jewish state? Does he view Israel as a sovereign democratic nation and a valuable ally of the United States or as a racist, rogue state in need of correction and outside intervention?
ADINA KUTNICKI: Segueing back to Obama’s malignant mistreatment of Israel, its dimensions are all over the map, so to speak. In both word and deed, he blames Israel for every calamity befalling the Arab/Muslim world. Again, his worldview harks back to Orientalism and its “intellectual” twin poison, colonialism.
Notably, he was raised in a family where colonialism shaped his outlook. It also doesn’t help that he harbors unremitting anti-semitic feelings emblematic to leftists and Islamists. A double whammy. Under this converging vortex a perfect storm is always brewing, eliciting the real question: how could he not despise Israel, being that those closest to him uphold similar leanings? The axiom, “tell me who your friends are and I’ll tell you who you are” is an authentic truism.
Revealingly, the following video attests to the efficacy of the aforementioned worldview. Lo and behold, Edward Said (the godfather of Orientalism) is its author. Even more so,Said (up until his death) and Obama were VERY close friends, and this is a fact.
Due to all of the above (and so much more), let there be no doubt: Obama views Israel as a “rogue” nation-state, a historical “mistake” which must be rectified. It follows that any envisioned “peace” plan (which would be acceptable to him) would, in actuality, result in Israel becoming a miniaturized rump, incapable of fending off her enemies. In essence, dying a slow death is his preferred option, but he is no longer counting on one avenue to eliminate Israel as an “irritant.”
WOLFF BACHNER: Do you believe that Obama is determined to sign a treaty with Iran just to enhance his reputation and establish his legacy? Or do you believe Obama has far more nefarious and destructive intentions that will do unimaginable harm to Israel and the entire world? Is he willing to allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons to punish Israel for refusing to submit to his demands and to payback Netanyahu for putting Israel’s survival ahead of Obama’s policies?
ADINA KUTNICKI: Enter, Iran.
In answer to your all important question relative to Iran, I firmly believe that Obama views Iran as a double-edged weapon. On the one hand, Obama wants to go down in history as the only world leader capable of bringing Iran’s mullahs to the negotiating table, such that it is. But the overriding factor involves much more than his legacy, falsified, as we know it will (eventually) be.
Paradoxically, American patriots and Israeli Zionists are not the only ones who see through Obama’s willful deceit, his smoke and mirrors show.Glaringly, the Gulf states are more than leery and hold Obama wholly responsible for the regional (and global) chaos. Yes, what a startling turn of (geo-political) events.
Writing in the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, columnist Dr. Ahmad Al-Faraj, while supporting Israeli’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech before Congress, not only called Obama “one of the worst U.S. presidents;” he also exposed the nature of so-called “democratic revolutions” in the region. Stated al-Faraj:
“Since Obama is the godfather of the prefabricated revolutions in the Arab world, and since he is the ally of political Islam, [which is]the caring mother of [all]the terrorist organizations, and since he is working to sign an agreement with Iran that will come at the expense of the U.S.’s longtime allies in the Gulf, I am very glad of Netanyahu’s firm stance and [his decision]to speak against the nuclear agreement at the American Congress despite the Obama administration’s anger and fury.”
Even so, as some of Inquisitr’s readers are already aware, I operate a geo-political blog, among other related endeavors. Its overriding essence revolves around American and Israeli concerns. This is no accident.
So as an American-Israeli (possessing a strong grounding in geo-politics, the Middle East and with a specialty in the Muslim Brotherhood), Islam, with all its facets, has become a steady “companion”, almost like a second skin.
Most advisedly, always keep the following uppermost in mind: there is no distinction between Sunni and Shia Islamic designs towards America, Israel and the west in general. Their main point of friction revolves around an internal struggle for hegemony, as to who lands on top for ultimate control of the ummah, the collective community of Islamic peoples. Supra-national.
Thus, it makes no sense to rework the wheel, being that a full-on analysis (re Obama’s intentions respective to Iran) has been recently explored at my blog site.
Consequentially – and as a parting “gift” and adjunct to this interview – let me present, ”HUSSEIN Obama’s Subterfuge Via Iran’s Centrifuges: “Israel’s Voice” Takes Charge In Washington, D.C. March 3, 2015. Raise Your Voices Too!”-
“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Truer words never spoken.
Sign up to get alerts from Joe!